While it is not intended to and does not replace the internal control framework, but rather incorporates the internal control framework within it, companies may decide to look to this enterprise risk management framework both to satisfy their internal control needs and to move toward a fuller risk management process.
Among the most critical challenges for managements is determining how much risk the entity is prepared to and does accept as it strives to create value.
This report will better enable them to meet this challenge. John J. All entities face uncertainty, and the challenge for management is to determine how much uncertainty to accept as it strives to grow stakeholder value. Uncertainty presents both risk and opportunity, with the potential to erode or enhance value. Enterprise risk management enables management to effectively deal with uncertainty and associated risk and opportunity, enhancing the capacity to build value.
In sum, enterprise risk management helps an entity get to where it wants to go and avoid pitfalls and surprises along the way. Events with a negative impact represent risks, which can prevent value creation or erode existing value. Events with positive impact may offset negative impacts or represent opportunities.
Opportunities are the possibility that an event will occur and positively affect the achievement of objectives, supporting value creation or preservation. Management channels opportunities back to its strategy or objective-setting processes, formulating plans to seize the opportunities.
The definition reflects certain fundamental concepts. It captures key concepts fundamental to how companies and other organizations manage risk, providing a basis for application across organizations, industries, and sectors.
It focuses directly on achievement of objectives established by a particular entity and provides a basis for defining enterprise risk management effectiveness.
This categorization of entity objectives allows a focus on separate aspects of enterprise risk management. These distinct but overlapping categories — a particular objective can fall into more than one category — address different entity needs and may be the direct responsibility of different executives. This categorization also allows distinctions between what can be expected from each category of objectives.
Another category, safeguarding of resources, used by some entities, also is described. Components of Enterprise Risk Management Enterprise risk management consists of eight interrelated components. These are derived from the way management runs an enterprise and are integrated with the management process.
Risks are assessed on an inherent and a residual basis. Effective communication also occurs in a broader sense, flowing down, across, and up the entity. Monitoring is accomplished through ongoing management activities, separate evaluations, or both. Enterprise risk management is not strictly a serial process, where one component affects only the next. It is a multidirectional, iterative process in which almost any component can and does influence another.
Relationship of Objectives and Components There is a direct relationship between objectives, which are what an entity strives to achieve, and enterprise risk management components, which represent what is needed to achieve them. The relationship is depicted in a three-dimensional matrix, in the form of a cube. Thus, the components are also criteria for effective enterprise risk management.
The eight components will not function identically in every entity. Application in small and mid-size entities, for example, may be less formal and less structured. Nonetheless, small entities still can have effective enterprise risk management, as long as each of the components is present and functioning properly. Limitations While enterprise risk management provides important benefits, limitations exist. In addition to factors discussed above, limitations result from the realities that human judgment in decision making can be faulty, decisions on responding to risk and establishing controls need to consider the relative costs and benefits, breakdowns can occur because of human failures such as simple errors or mistakes, controls can be circumvented by collusion of two or more people, and management has the ability to override enterprise risk management decisions.
This enterprise risk management framework encompasses internal control, forming a more robust conceptualization and tool for management. Internal control is defined and described in Internal Control — Integrated Framework. Because that framework has stood the test of time and is the basis for existing rules, regulations, and laws, that document remains in place as the definition of and framework for internal control.
While only portions of the text of Internal Control — Integrated Framework are reproduced in this framework, the entirety of that framework is incorporated by reference into this one. Roles and Responsibilities Everyone in an entity has some responsibility for enterprise risk management.
The chief executive officer is ultimately responsible and should assume ownership. A risk officer, financial officer, internal auditor, and others usually have key support responsibilities.
Other entity personnel are responsible for executing enterprise risk management in accordance with established directives and protocols. Organization of This Report This report is in two volumes. The first volume contains the Framework as well as this Executive Summary. The Framework defines enterprise risk management and describes principles and concepts, providing direction for all levels of management in businesses and other organizations to use in evaluating and enhancing the effectiveness of enterprise risk management.
This Executive Summary is a high-level overview directed to chief executives, other senior executives, board members, and regulators.
The second volume, Application Techniques, provides illustrations of techniques useful in applying elements of the framework. The board should consider seeking input from internal auditors, external auditors, and others. Hirth, Jr. He held the position for 4.
On February 1, ,Paul J. Sobel became the new COSO chairman. Due to questionable corporate political campaign finance practices and foreign corrupt practices in the mids, the U.
Congress enacted campaign finance law reforms and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act FCPA which criminalized transnational bribery and required companies to implement internal control programs.
In response, the Treadway Commission, a private-sector initiative, was formed in to inspect, analyze, and make recommendations on fraudulent corporate financial reporting. The Treadway Commission studied the financial information reporting system over the period from October to September and issued a report of findings and recommendations in October , Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. In September , the four volume report entitled Internal Control— Integrated Framework [2] was released by COSO and later re-published with minor amendments in This report presented a common definition of internal control and provided a framework against which internal control systems may be assessed and improved.
This report is one standard that U. The COSO framework defines internal control as a process, effected by an entity's board of directors, management and other personnel, designed to provide 'reasonable assurance' regarding the achievement of objectives in the following categories:.
The COSO internal control framework consists of five interrelated components derived from the way management runs a business. According to COSO, these components provide an effective framework for describing and analyzing the internal control system implemented in an organization as required by financial regulations see Securities Exchange Act of , [4] The five components are the following:. Control environment: The control environment sets the tone of an organization, influencing the control consciousness of its people.
It is the foundation for all other components of internal control, providing discipline and structure. Control environment factors include the integrity, ethical values, management's operating style, delegation of authority systems, as well as the processes for managing and developing people in the organization. Risk assessment: Every entity faces a variety of risks from external and internal sources that must be assessed. A precondition to risk assessment is establishment of objectives and thus risk assessment is the identification and analysis of relevant risks to the achievement of assigned objectives.
Risk assessment is a prerequisite for determining how the risks should be managed. Control activities: Control activities are the policies and procedures that help ensure management directives are carried out. They help ensure that necessary actions are taken to address the risks that may hinder the achievement of the entity's objectives.
Control activities occur throughout the organization, at all levels and in all functions. They include a range of activities as diverse as approvals, authorizations, verifications, reconciliations, reviews of operating performance, security of assets and segregation of duties.
Information and communication: Information systems play a key role in internal control systems as they produce reports, including operational, financial and compliance-related information, that make it possible to run and control the business.
In a broader sense, effective communication must ensure information flows down, across and up the organization. For example, formalized procedures exist for people to report suspected fraud. Effective communication should also be ensured with external parties, such as customers, suppliers, regulators and shareholders about related policy positions. Monitoring : Internal control systems need to be monitored—a process that assesses the quality of the system's performance over time.
This is accomplished through ongoing monitoring activities or separate evaluations. Internal control deficiencies detected through these monitoring activities should be reported upstream and corrective actions should be taken to ensure continuous improvement of the system. Internal control involves human action, which introduces the possibility of errors in processing or judgment. Internal control can also be overridden by collusion among employees see separation of duties or coercion by top management.
In the COSO model, those objectives are applied to five key components control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Given the number of possible matrices, it's not surprising that the number of audits can get out of hand. In , COSO initiated a project, and engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers, to develop a framework that would be readily usable by managements to evaluate and improve their organizations' enterprise risk management. High-profile business scandals and failures e.
Enron, Tyco International, Adelphia, Peregrine Systems and WorldCom led to calls for enhanced corporate governance and risk management. As a result, the Sarbanes—Oxley Act was enacted. This law extends the long-standing requirement for public companies to maintain systems of internal control, requiring management to certify and the independent auditor to attest to the effectiveness of those systems.
The Internal Control — Integrated Framework continues to serve as the broadly accepted standard [ citation needed ] for satisfying those reporting requirements; however, in COSO published Enterprise Risk Management - Integrated Framework. This enterprise risk management framework is still geared to achieving an entity's objectives; however, the framework now includes four categories:. The eight components of enterprise risk management encompass the previous five components of the Internal Control-Integrated Framework while expanding the model to meet the growing demand for risk management:.
Internal environment: The internal environment encompasses the tone of an organization, and sets the basis for how risk is viewed and addressed by an entity's people, including risk management philosophy and risk appetite, integrity and ethical values, and the environment in which they operate. Objective setting: Objectives must exist before management can identify potential events affecting their achievement. Enterprise risk management ensures that management has in place a process to set objectives and that the chosen objectives support and align with the entity's mission and are consistent with its risk appetite.
Event identification : Internal and external events affecting achievement of an entity's objectives must be identified, distinguishing between risks and opportunities.
0コメント